No matching source?? Is that even possible? No matching sources found?? 0% plagiarism?? Am i really that good? haha Before i launch into the fact that i got 0% plagiarism and start gloating, i have to bring myself back to reality. Considering that people who had plagiarism in their articles had been quoted wrong websites for their parts that they plagiarised. For example, my friend had a quote of hers quoted from a nuclear physics website. Technology and nuclear physics? Man, that is one screwed up report. Haha. Another example. My friend got plagiarised for this phrase, "there are two sides to the coin" A perfectly normal expression, yet it was detected and said to be plagiarism. Damn. If it is like that, the program might as well say that the whole article is plagiarism. After all, (if you are believer of alternative universe and such), there would certainly be people who written the same thing. You just wouldnt know. Also, i know for a fact that i did quote from articles, and i did somewhat plagiarised a bit, but! it's a citation. Still, the program should have detected that. Damn that SafeAssignment. But still, imagine the look, or should i say, the words of surprise on my MSN screen when i tell them i had 0% plagiarism. Damn, that felt good. All right SafeAssignment, sorry i damned you. You made my night yesterday, and for that you dont deserve this otherwise useless rhetoric. You will still be immortalised by the school and improved on. But yes, you made my night yesterday. For the rest of the people out there who had their reports marked red with SafeAssignment, i shall give you a word of comfort. Actually, what the hell, maybe two. TOO BAD! (Dont quote me on this please. You dont want any additional plagiarism right? haha) Justin ranted at 8:01:00 am on the |